Save as My Collection

LikeSNU 서울대학교 도서관
SNU Big Data Knowledge Information Platform

What is LikeSNU

Full Menu

AI

Your Browsing History

22 More

Report registration
  • Type
  • Title
  • Group
  • Link
  • Thumbnail
Paper List
Paper List (0Count) Export to Excel

There is no data.

헌법합치적 법률해석의 관점에서 바라본 주소가 누락된 자필증서유언의 효력 —서울중앙지방법원 2014. 2. 21. 선고 2012가합527377 판결—

Author
정구태
Journal Title
강원법학
Publication Year
2014
Topics
Summary

This paper discusses the constitutional conformity interpretation of the validity of a holographic will missing an address. While the 'address' portion of Article 1066(1) of the Civil Act is unconstitutional in principle, it is only valid when the testator's identity cannot be secured by name, profession, and the content of the will; however, it should not apply if the identity can be secured by these elements alone. The paper argues that the will in the case under review should be valid because the testator's identity can be confirmed despite the missing address.

Go Source Add to Selection

Quotation Papers(0)

List of papers cited by this paper

Thesis Indicator

Related Content

LikeSNU analyzes your query semantically to recommend related resources.

헌법합치적 법률해석의 관점에서 바라본 주소가 누락된 자필증서유언의 효력 —서울중앙지방법원 2014. 2. 21. 선고 2012가합527377 판결— Legal Validity of the Will by Holograph Document without Decedent's Address from the viewpoint of Constitutional Interpretation of the Law - Seoul Central District Court Decision 2012Gahab527377 delivered on February 21, 2014 -

정구태 · 2014

강원법학

헌법재판소의 민법에 대한 위헌심사

윤진수 · 2021

서울대학교 법학

遺言에 관한 形式的 嚴格主義와 遺言者의 眞意

金榮喜 · 2008

민사판례연구

Previous
Next
TOP