LikeSNU 서울대학교 도서관
SNU Big Data Knowledge Information Platform

Full Menu

AI
Report registration
  • Type
  • Title
  • Group
  • Link
  • Thumbnail
Paper List
Paper List (0Count) Export to Excel

There is no data.

비행보장수당의 통상임금 해당성 - 서울남부지방법원 2014가합10336 판결, 서울고등법원 2015나2070165 판결을 중심으로 -

Author
김희성, 한광수
Journal Title
법학연구
Publication Year
2019
Summary

This paper critically examines the court's fixedness-centered approach to determining whether a flight guarantee allowance constitutes an ordinary wage, and aims to contribute to resolving future ordinary wage lawsuits by specifically examining the conceptual indicators of predetermined wage, uniformity, and fixedness. Recently, the court ruled that the flight guarantee allowance does not meet the requirements for ordinary wage because its payment and amount vary depending on the condition of "30 hours of flight per month." Ordinary wage-related lawsuits are unfolding around the requirements of fixedness and the application of the principle of trust and good faith, and controversy is expected to continue due to inconsistent rulings by the courts.

Quotation Papers(0)

List of papers cited by this paper

Thesis Indicator

Related Content

LikeSNU analyzes your query semantically to recommend related resources.

일급제 근로자에게 지급되는 월 고정수당을 시간급 통상임금으로 환산하는 경우 가산수당산정을 위한 가산율을 포함해야 하는지 – 대법원 2020.1.22., 선고 2015다73067 전원합의체 판결을 중심으로 –

한광수 · 2020

노동법논총

통상임금의 기본원리와 개념요소에 대한 검토 - 대법원과 2013년 하급심 판례를 중심으로(상) A Study on the Basic Principle and Conceptional Elements of the Ordinary Wage - Based upon the Rulings by the Supreme Court and Lower Courts in 2013

민창욱 · 2013

저스티스

통상임금의 기본원리와 개념요소에 대한 검토 - 대법원과 2013년 하급심 판례를 중심으로(하) A Study on the Basic Principle and Conceptional Elements of Ordinary Wage - Based upon the Rulings by the Supreme Court and Lower Courts in 2013

민창욱 · 2013

저스티스

Previous
Next
TOP