LikeSNU 서울대학교 도서관
SNU Big Data Knowledge Information Platform

Full Menu

AI
Report registration
  • Type
  • Title
  • Group
  • Link
  • Thumbnail
Paper List
Paper List (0Count) Export to Excel

There is no data.

부킹닷컴상 약관의 제3자(고객)에 대한 효력과 규제 - 서울고등법원 2020.5.20. 선고, 2019누38108 판결을 중심으로 -

Author
신정은
Journal Title
외법논집
Publication Year
2020
Summary

Seoul High Court revoked the KFTC’s corrective order against Booking.com’s non-refundable terms, ruling that the online platform operator is not a ‘business operator’ under the Act on the Regulation of Terms and Conditions. The ruling highlights the complex contract structure of the platform and the potential for unilateral application of accommodation conditions to third-party customers through registration terms and conditions. It argues that the KFTC should review Booking.com’s registration terms, considering the interests of customers, rather than targeting accommodation providers.

Cited Papers(0)

List of papers cited by this paper

Paper Metrics

Related Content

LikeSNU analyzes your query semantically to recommend related resources.

Previous
Next

공정거래 2024년 주요 판례 회고 Introduction and Comments on 2024 Precedents Focused on Competition law Issues

손동환 · 2025

경쟁법연구

부킹닷컴 ‘환불불가 상품 조항’의 불공정 약관 여부 - 서울고법 2020.5.20. 선고 2019누38018 판결에 대한 평석을 중심으로 -

최병규 · 2020

경제법연구

숙박예약 플랫폼 환불불가 조항과 약관규제법상 불공정 약관 여부에 대한 법적 고찰 - 대법원 2023. 9. 21. 선고 2020두41399 판결을 중심으로 -

최민수 · 2024

소비자법연구

Previous
Next