SNU Big Data Knowledge Information Platform
Full Menu
AI
Your Browsing History
31 More
loading...
Report registration
Paper List
포렌식 미란다 원칙과 절차적 정의
Author
김면기, 유승진
Journal Title
형사정책연구
Publication Year
2019
Topics
Summary
This paper argues for more active discussion of procedural justice in the field of forensics, emphasizing the need to address the imbalance caused by the difficulty for law enforcement subjects to understand the principles and limitations of forensic techniques and the government's monopolization of equipment. It examines ways to strengthen procedural justice in the field of forensics through the ‘forensic Miranda’ principle, referencing the Miranda decision of the U.S. Supreme Court. This highlights the importance of rights advisement to address the lack of understanding of forensic evidence and ensure fair law enforcement.
Related Content
LikeSNU analyzes your query semantically to recommend related resources.
-
소크라테스는 왜 죽었을까? : 오심과 권력, 그리고 인간을 심판한 법의 역사
-
허위 자백과 오판 : 피의자신문과 형사사법의 구조
-
Criminal procedure in Europe
-
(법학도에게는 포렌식기법을 공학도에게는 수사절차법을 알려주는) 디지털 포렌식
-
Forensic practice in criminal cases
-
Illicitly Obtained Evidence at the International Criminal Court
-
디지털포렌식 기술 =
-
디지털포렌식 이론 =
-
과학수사론 =
-
법과학을 적용한 형사사법의 선진화 방안 =
-
디지털 범죄 수사와 기본권 =
-
The future of crime and punishment : smart policies for reducing crime and saving money /
-
Criminal procedure : from first contact to appeal
-
French criminal justice : a comparative account of the investigation and prosecution of crime in France
-
Forensic science and law : investigative applications in criminal, civil, and family justice
-
민사소송법
-
Basic criminal procedures
-
범죄인 프로파일링
-
캐나다 경찰의 주요 정책 : 캐나다 경찰은 왜 핑크 셔츠를 입을까
-
Kafka's law : The Trial and American criminal justice
Previous
Next
Previous
Next